Forex broker inc demonoid
June 24, Overview In software development, testing each part of a program is crucial to assert that all individual parts are correct. In the previous article we covered some testing strategies, which you can check it here. Either way, unit tests are an important step in the development phase of an application.
Here are some key reasons to not skip the proccess of creating unit tests : They help to fix bugs early in the development cycle and save costs; Understanding the code base is essential and unit tests are some of the best way of enabling developers to learn all they can about the application and make changes quickly; Good unit tests may also serve as documentation for your software; Code is more reliable and reusable because in order to make unit testing possible, modular programming is the standard technique used; Guidelines Our test case should be independent; Test only one code at a time; Follow clear and consistent naming conventions; Since we are doing unit tests, we need to isolate dependencies.
We will use mocks for that. This way we can control the behavior of our dependencies and test just the code we want to test. Later on we will do integration tests which uses no mocks and tests the actual behavior of all components and their integration. Our testing framework of choice will be JUnit, it provides assertions to identify test method, so be sure to include in your maven pom. Org reached out to Al Brooks directly and notified him that a review was pending.
We asked for some sort of performance summary. He refused. His response was that by disclosing his individual trading performance, that he would be committing a criminal act or would be in violation of securities laws. Is showing a record of trades a criminal act? Org, in the past two years, has written extensively about trading educators.
Not once have we ever witnessed a trading educator getting into trouble for being honest with consumers. In fact, we have been closely involved in both the criminal and civil prosecution of over a dozen fraudulently promoted trading educators and trading systems. There is nothing illegal with showing a trading record.
However, it is fraudulent to show a trading record that has been falsified for marketing purposes. Perhaps this is the reason why Al Brooks does not publish a trading record? Of course, trading educators like Al Brooks will attempt to obfuscate and confuse this point. This is pure nonsense. Securities regulators love disclosure. The more the better.
Perhaps Al Brooks should contact world champion trader Kevin Davey about his published track record. Kevin has been selling trading system since before Jesus walked the earth, and has never had a problem with a securities regulator. Huge red flag or butt plug. Does a lack of a track record automatically disqualify?
Does Al Brooks lack of a track record mean that he is a scam artist? Or a con man? In my opinion, it does not. The massive amount of promotions, videos, books, seminars and courses simply paint a picture of what Al Brooks truly is…he is a just another trading promoter. Al keeps his promotional efforts clean and tidy. But the reality is he is just an average guy out selling the dream to the unwashed masses. Al Brooks is certainly not going to qualify as one of TradingSchools worst educators.
Not even close. The real problem with Al Brooks Trading educators all seem to occupy a particular niche. Some educators claim that magical order flow indicators can divine the future, others claim that rocket science mathematics infused into a moving average will surely bring big trading profits, others claim that year-old Japanese stick characters portend the future.
What exactly does that mean? Quite simply, from Al Brooks perspective, he claims that he can look at just about any 5-minute bar, and from these tiny bits of information, he can consistently predict the future. What does an Al Brooks prediction look like? Indecision bars signalling continuation of reversal points. Making these weird, highly indigestible, utterly confusing references to things that apparently only he can see.
The entire trading room is meant to be a lesson in confusing terminology, innuendo, and twisted statements. Everything is meant to lead the consumer back to the reference material, in other words, if you buy the book specifically on Trends, then you will understand what I am saying.
And after you buy the book on Reversals, then you understand this. And after buy the book on Ranges, then you can understand the ranges terminology. And if the books are not enough, then you need to purchase the hour course that ties it all together. On and on it goes, until finally the disgruntled and dismayed start writing to TradingSchools.
Org and complaining and are pissed off about wasting time and money. No scientific evidence Thankfully, multiple readers sent me copies of Al Brooks trading books. Although the books are stuffed full of perfect chart examples, there is absolutely no backtested evidence that any of his chart patterns are valid. Everything he writes is subjective and pure opinion.
Kajind